“Different methods of communication and of identifying users on communication networks will become irrelevant. I use many different methods of electronic communication, including a home phone, a mobile phone, e-mail, instant messaging, video conferencing, online forums and social networking sites and so on. Why should I have to distinguish between these forms of communication and they way they identify their users – why should I have to have an e-mail address, several phone numbers, several usernames of different services – why can users not just have a single user name or number which can be used to reach them however you like? Why should I have to use multiple devices such as a home phone, a cell phone, a computer and a laptop to communicate – why not have one device that can utilise all methods of communication but that comes in many different shapes and sizes – something desk-sized like a computer, something portable and then something pocket-sized. We need to take the focus out of the “how” and turn it more to the “who” and “what” of communications.”
From the section on the future of telecommunications from my thesis (of sorts). Thoughs/feedback welcome/requested 
Read MoreOtherwise, IT leaders will not be able to respond effectively to 'go green' demands Read More
How much is sold and who to remains unclear Read More
As I promised my faithful reader, I have obtained at great risk to my life and well - being, photographic evidence of the conspiracy!
behold!
See the difference in the packaging? subtle very subtle...
Again! further subtley, notice the difference in sizes between the matches! they are reducing the capacity of fire!
you cannot claim you weren't warned! its going to happen!
Read MorePace of change in mobile market is slow Read More
Threat to Air New Zealand and other customers averted Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment